Quick Links:
BULLETIN BOARD
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Libby Exigency Project
MDT in cooperation with Lincoln County is quickly developing a project to replace the bridge on S-482, Farm to Market Road that was damaged by flooding in December 2025. Design is underway for the new bridge and roadway construction, while environmental, utility and right-of-way impacts are being coordinated. MDT is advancing this project quickly with the aim to have a permanent solution by the end of this year. The multi-span bridge will use prestressed concrete girders, with steel pile foundations, and a conventional concrete deck. MDT is expediting the procurement of certain superstructure elements. MDT will purchase the prestressed concrete girders, steel rocker bearings, and hardware in advance of construction and the materials will be delivered to the project site or local Maintenance yard during construction. A shortened advertising period is scheduled to begin on June 11th, 2026 with the Bid Letting occurring on June 25th. The anticipated Notice to Proceed is July 13th.
Preliminary Quantities have been posted to the MDT Contracting & Bidding Webpage. PDF: PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
New Q&A Forum Closing Time: Beginning with the April 9th bid letting, the Q&A Forum will close to Contractor questions at 8:00am (previously 10am) on the Monday before bid letting unless it’s a state holiday. Answers provided by the Department to the questions, clarifications, and notifications can be posted up to 5:00 p.m., the day before the bid opening.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Watch - Public Bid Opening - Live Stream: ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advertised Projects: If you would like to receive the Invitation for Bids PDF document when projects are advertised, please send an email request to mdtcps@mt.gov. Follow the link for more information: EMAIL DISTRIBUTION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
201 - S-238/S-300 RYEGATE - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 10-APR-2026 03:09 PM
Company: Knife River
Contact: Van Hildreth
Special Provision #36 is Calcium Chloride. Measurement and Payment is indicated to be Misc Item A. Bid form has Item A at 77 lbs Special Provision #37 is Dustpods. Measurement and Payment is indicated to be Misc Item B. Bid form has Item B at 1,438,387 lbs Shouldn't the items be reversed? (Dustpods Measurement and Payment to be Misc Item A, 77 lbs)
Answer
Submitted: Friday 17-APR-2026 11:31 AM
Polymer Stabilization is Bid Item 104 030 090 - MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A – LB.
Calcium Chloride Stabilization is Bid Item 104 030 095 - MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS B – LB.
Special Provision No. 36, CALCIUM CHLORIDE STABILIZATION, is hereby updated: CALCIUM CHLORIDE STABILIZATION
Special Provision No. 37, POLYMER STABILIZATION, is hereby updated: POLYMER STABILIZATION
-2-
Submitted: Wednesday 22-APR-2026 05:07 PM
Company: Knife River
Contact: Van Hildreth
Special Provision 36. Calcium Chloride Stabilization 5. Mixing and Placement Please provide equipment specifications for what is intended as a "central plant pugmill mixer".
Answer
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 08:08 AM
Special Provision 36 references the same equipment that is required in 301.03.5B for surfacing aggregates. Plan to pugmill the material as you would any MDT surfacing aggregate.
-3-
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 11:10 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The project is requesting a Cable Rail system for the shoulders over Big Coulee Cr at Sta 754+50. I do not see where a minimum deflection requirement is called out to determine the post spacing through the run. It does show a post spacing of 7'-0" for the 3 posts over the culvert which equates to a 8ft deflection system. Does the Department want to continue with a cable system over the culvert that has 8ft of deflection but only 2ft of clearance to the drop off of the culvert? Beyond the culvert, the shoulder widths and steep drop offs will also fall outside of the cable deflection capabilities. The project will also be waiving the minimum length requirements that the cable system was tested with to meet MASH requirements.
Answer
Submitted: 27-APR-2026 3:55PM
Cable guardrail will be used over Big Coulee Creek at 754+50 and utilize 7-foot post spacing throughout. Road sheet 12 has been updated noting the required post spacing and can be viewed here: UPDATED SHEET
202 - FLORENCE EAST & SF 199 BECKWITH ST MSLA CNTY - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 12:25 PM
Company: Z&Z Asphalt
Contact: Spencer Foster
In reference to Bid Item 403010257 Crack Filling Mastic -
Since no U.S. manufacturer produces ASTM D8260 Type 3 mastic, will MDT grant a non-availability waiver for the BABA requirements for this material? Or will the standard ASTM D8260 Type 1 mastic that has been used in the past and that maintenance division still uses be acceptable?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 28-APR-2026 08:20 AM
The Department cannot grant non-availability waivers. ASTM D8260 Type 1 is acceptable for use on this project.
203 - RICEVILLE-NORTH & SOUTH - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 28-APR-2026 02:36 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 12:39PM
Bid item 618 030 005 Traffic Control Devices CB is hereby changed to a quantity of 200,000 units. An amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 21-APR-2026 04:36 PM
Company: United Materials
Contact: David Anderson
Will MDT add 20 working days to the contract? 35 working days is not enough time to complete this project. All work is done a 2 lane highway - there are cure time requirements on bridge work that won't allow work to start on the other side of the bridge until the cure time expires. There will be also days lost due to traffic control and temporary guardrail changeovers.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 22-APR-2026 02:33 PM
MDT will add 20 working days to the contract. Contract time is hereby changed to 55 working days.
UPDATE
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 07:20 AM
Special provision #2 CONTRACT TIME is hereby replaced with the following special provision: UPDATED CONTRACT TIME
204 - AUGUSTA INTERCHANGE NORTHEAST - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 21-APR-2026 01:28 PM
Company: United Materials
Contact: Estimating
The current NTP does not allow enough time between award date to comply with SP#12,
Railroad Coordination and Flagging.
Bid date = 4/30
Notice of award = 5/12
Notice to proceed = 7/6
Up to 12 weeks (from notice of award) to obtain railroad agreement and insurance = 8/4 This would only leave 3 weeks to complete chipseal. Please advise
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 22-APR-2026 02:53 PM
The Notice to Proceed is hereby changed to a Flexible Notice to Proceed date of August 4th, 2026. This allows time to obtain permits and agreements.
Special Provision #2 Contract Time is hereby replaced with the following special provision: CONTRACT TIME – FLEX TIME PROCEED DATE
-2-
Submitted: Sunday 26-APR-2026 07:00 PM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
On previous sign projects, if a sign location required angle iron backbraing for the smaller top sign on a guide sign installation, it would include pounds to be paid under the Structural Steel bid item. Please confirm that this project will pay the pounds under Structural Steel for locations that require those angle irons.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 28-APR-2026 11:12 AM
Angle Iron pounds have been included in the quantities for smaller top signs. This quantity is to be paid per Section 619.04.
205 - RRXING-BENTON AVE-HELENA - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 15-APR-2026 08:47 AM
Company: HighMark Traffic Services
Contact: Brad Meyer
The bid item 620011355 Words & Symbols -White-High Perf Tape is a 3M product. Detail Drawings Sheet 56 Specifies Hot Tape which is a different product. Please Clarify.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 20-APR-2026 01:27 PM
As noted in the special provision entitled “HIGH-PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE”, the preference on this project is for the 3M product, not the hot tape shown in the detail drawings.
-2-
Submitted: Thursday 16-APR-2026 11:27 AM
Company: TLA North
Contact: Frank Dugas
The special provisions section 26 item B does not list the desired lumen level of the LED Luminaires. Please advise the desired lumen level.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 12:55PM
As noted in the special provision entitled “HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRE LED”, the desired lumen level of the LED luminaires is 14,900 delivered lumens.
-3-
Submitted: Thursday 16-APR-2026 11:22 AM
Company: TLA North
Contact: Frank Dugas
In the special provisions item 27 ...HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRE LED ..B calls out "Furnish LEDs rated to produce a minimum of 90% intensity at 100,000 hours of life based on IES TM-21 (L90). " After an extensive search, we believe there are no commercially available roadway luminaires on the US market that meet L90 @100,000. The best we have been able to locate is L70 @ 100,000. Please advise the name of the manufacturer you are basing the L90 @ 100,000 specification on.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 21-APR-2026 03:10 PM
Special Provision #26 High Efficacy Luminaire LED is hereby replaced with the following special provision: UPDATED HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRE LED
-4-
Submitted: Friday 17-APR-2026 10:45 AM
Company: White Resources Group, Inc
Contact: Matthew White
608 010 060 Sidewalk - Reinforced 6 In - What reinforcement is required for this item? 609 010 030 Curb - Conc Median Type A - Is this item intended to be different than detailed drawing 609-10? On Sheet 17 of the plans, it appears that the curb is one inch taller than the detailed drawing which will require a different mold.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 11:56AM
608 010 060 Sidewalk - Reinforced 6 In. Provide #4 rebar at 12” OC in both directions.
609 010 030 Curb - Conc Median Type A. Follow the detail in the plans in place of the standard detail. The Quiet Zone regulations require a taller than standard median curb.
-5-
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 02:34 PM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The project has a bid item for Traffic Control -Day, but no bid item for flagging. Is flagging to be included in the daily rate as requested before? When bid this way, one rate does not account for the difference of a day requiring 1 flagger vs 4 flaggers. Essentially, a price is determined by evaluating the work sequence and duration, dividing the total cost by the number of anticipated work days, and creating an estimated average cost per day. If there is extra work added to the contract, the Departments position would be to add days to this bid item. Since the daily rate on this project will be an average, it is highly unlikely that added work will match the average conditions originally planned.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 09:21 AM
Include all traffic control costs in the Traffic Control-Day Item.
-6-
Submitted: Friday 24-APR-2026 03:28 PM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
Special provision 10 presents the work that will be performed by BNSF and further states that the Contractor will need to coordinate with BNSF for sequencing and traffic control to complete the work. Is the contractor responsible to provide traffic control for BNSF's operations? If so, will the Department provide BNSF's schedule & traffic control needs for bidding purposes. The method of payment in the contract does not allow for unknown work requirements by the traffic control provider. Furthermore, any coordination efforts with BNSF in advance of submitting a bid in no way is contractually binding on BNSF to adhere to the information they provide to the Contractor. A detailed breakdown of work duration, specific traffic control needs, length of shifts, days per week, day or night work, and if work will be performed in conjunction with the prime contractors work would all need to be presented as part of the contract documents to determine the Traffic Control-Day price.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 28-APR-2026 08:43 AM
For RR spur line removal operation, the contractor will be responsible for providing Traffic Control. The contractor will fill, compact, pave, and also pour the concrete median curb extension. Coordination of these efforts will be discussed at the mandatory RR PreCon meeting.
The RR will be responsible for any Traffic Control on the roadway or railroad during installation of the new RR signal.
Once the RR has completed signal work the contractor will be responsible for any Traffic Control and RR Flagging needed for the path work up to the RR Xing surface.
UPDATE
Submitted: Wednesday 29-APR-2026 09:09 AM
For RR spur line removal operation, the contractor will be responsible for providing Traffic Control. The contractor will fill, compact, pave, and also pour the concrete median curb extension. Coordination of these efforts will be discussed at the mandatory RR Precon meeting. This work will be done under full closure and will require the contractor to close Benton Avenue and provide full detours utilizing Custer Avenue, Montana Avenue, Cedar Street, and US Highway 12. All cost associated with this closure will be included in the Traffic Control-Day item.
The Traffic Control to control the roadway during the installation of the new RR signal will be tracked using the Traffic Control-Fixed item and the Traffic Control Rate Schedule.
Once the RR has completed signal work, the contractor will be responsible for any Traffic Control and RR Flagging needed for the path work up to the RR Xing surface. The Traffic Control required for this work will be included in the Traffic Control-Day item.
-7-
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 07:22 AM
Company: Montana Materials & Construction
Contact: Loren Blossom
Special provision # 11 states that it may take 12 weeks to obtain the required railroad permit. The contractor is to begin the process upon award. If the notice of award is 5/12 ...12 weeks is approximately August 1.
The current NTP is July 6. Can additional time be added to the contract to account for this potential delay?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 27-APR-2026 01:27PM
The Notice to Proceed is hereby changed to a Flexible Notice to Proceed date of July 27th, 2026. This allows time to obtain permits.
Special Provision #2 Contract Time is hereby replaced with the following special provision: CONTRACT TIME-FLEX PROCEED DATE
206 - SF 179 BERNICE CURVE BARRIER - April 30, 2026
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
301 - NEVI PROGRAM - INTERSTATE SYSTEM - July 29, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 18-MAR-2026 11:00 AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on April 7, 2026.
Project Name: NEVI Program- Interstate System
Project No: EV STWD(983)
Control No: 10436000
Project Description:
The Project consists of performing all services necessary to design, construct, operate, and maintain EV charging stations in compliance with the requirements described in the draft Contract included as Attachment 2. The EV charging stations will be located along Montana’s AFCs at locations to be determined by Proposers as described in the draft RFP included as Attachment 1. The work generally includes the following:
• Design and construct a minimum of four network-connected direct current (DC) 150 kilowatt (kW) charging ports, at each EV charging station, capable of simultaneously and continuously charging four EVs, located within approximately a one-mile driving distance of an AFC, and available for use by the public 24 hours per day, seven days per week, and year-round.
• Operate and maintain the EV charging infrastructure for a minimum of five years following EVSE Acceptance pursuant to Section 4.6.4 (EVSE Acceptance) of the Contract in accordance with the O&M Period requirements.
• Provide secure payment methods.
• Collect, process, retain, and share near real-time and static data.
• Provide a minimum of 20 percent of Eligible Project Cost.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ-ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Monday 23-MAR-2026 11:36 AM
MDT is hosting an SOQ Webinar at 11:00 am Mountain Time on March 25, 2026, to highlight important components of the RFQ. This informational webinar is open to the public with microphone and video disabled. All questions should be asked through the Q&A Forum in accordance with the RFQ and no questions will be answered during the webinar.
Topic: MDT SOQ Webinar
Time: Mar 25, 2026 11:00 AM Mountain Time (US and Canada)
Join Zoom Meeting
https://mt-gov.zoom.us/j/86089197890?pwd=3zMC8YUcouEzfTThbQAWgacDDVV5lS.1
Meeting ID: 860 8919 7890
Password: 590639
Dial by Telephone
+1 646 558 8656
Meeting ID: 860 8919 7890
Password: 590639
Find your local number: https://mt-gov.zoom.us/u/kbzpCWQBMV
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 25-MAR-2026 08:35AM
Update to the Personnel Experience Section 3.4 of the RFQ:
The Personnel Experience portion of the SOQ shall not exceed 16, 8.5”x11” pages (two pages maximum for each of the eight resumes). Personnel Experience is a scored element with a scoring total score of 300 points.
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 26-MAR-2026 07:36 AM
NEVI Program SOQ PowerPoint and Webinar: NEVI SOQ
-5-
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 11:55 AM
In lieu of the email mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov provided in Section 2.3: SOQ Submittal of the RFQ, please submit SOQ’s through the file transfer service to Eric Parrish at eparrish@mt.gov and Aubrey Yerger at ayerger@mt.gov. The email (mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov) appears to be invalid when used with the state file transfer service.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 26-MAR-2026 11:38AM
The SOQ submittal date posted to the Q&A forum is hereby amended to April 15th at 11:00 a.m. local time to align with the procurement schedule in the RFQ.
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-APR-2026 11:56AM
The Preproposal meeting has been rescheduled for Tuesday, May 26th, 2026, from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM local time.
-3-
Submitted: Friday 10-APR-2026 08:34AM
The introduction (Page 1, Paragraph 3) of the RFQ is hereby modified as follows:
“Proposers may elect to pursue one, multiple, or all a minimum of three EV charging stations identified in the subsequent Request for Proposals (RFP). Following evaluation of the Statement of Qualifications (SOQs), MDT will identify a shortlist of Proposers that will receive an RFP and may submit a Proposal to MDT. After evaluation of Proposals, Montana Transportation Commission (MTC) will select one NEVI Contractor, and MDT will enter into one three or more EV charging station-specific agreements with the NEVI Contractor. “
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 23-APR-2026 09:16 AM
In support of Q&A clarification #3 the following definition applies:
In accordance with 23 CFR 680.104, EV charging station means the area in the immediate vicinity of a group of chargers and includes the chargers, supporting equipment, parking areas adjacent to the chargers, and lanes for vehicle ingress and egress. A charging station could comprise only part of the property on which it is located.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 19-MAR-2026 09:18 AM
Company: MN8 Energy
Contact: Brianna Alix
Within the RFQ, it is outlined that there will be an SOQ webinar held on 3/25. Could you please share how we should register for the session?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 23-MAR-2026 11:29 AM
MDT will post the SOQ webinar information as a notification to the Q&A Forum.
-2-
Submitted: Monday 30-MAR-2026 12:59 PM
Company: Voltpost
Contact: Olivia Cosio
Is MDT only interested in DCFC along AFCs? Can these federal funds also go towards Level 2 chargers at the zones outlined in the RFP?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 01-APR-2026 08:25 AM
This project will not offer funding for AC level 2 charging ports.
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-APR-2026 08:31 AM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
1. Does the applicant have to apply under joint venture if the EVSE provider is a contractor on the project? Or can we just provide the letter of commitments for them?
2. Can we include cover pages? If so, does that count towards the max page amount limit?
3. Does the percentage of their contributions on a project have to be on the key personnel resume?
4. Do we have to register prior to submission of the SOQ?
5. Does the form have to stay within their individual page limit? For example, if form a is 1 pg, form b is 3pgs, form c is 1 pg, not exceeding 5pgs in total does that suffice?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 2-APR-2026 03:29PM
1. No, Proposer does not have to propose as a JV. The Proposer can propose as a single entity led by a prime with subcontractors or a JV. If the Proposer intends to form a JV, but has not yet done so, the Proposer can provide a signed letter of intent or teaming agreement stating intent to form a JV if awarded.
2. A cover page may be included for the whole proposal and a cover page to separate each section outlined in the RFQ. These sheets will not count towards the max page limit.
3. No, the percentage contribution/time spent on a particular project doesn’t specifically need to be included on the key personnel resume.
4. Per section 3.4 of the RFQ,"the EVSE Contractor and any other team memeber that will perform construction or installation is required to be a licensed contractor in the state of Montana prior to the execution of the Contract."
5. The Max Pages in scoring table 4.2.1 should be followed for page limits. Each form and section should not exceed the designated page limits.
-4-
Submitted: Monday 13-APR-2026 03:46 PM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
Per the RFQ it states to send the submission to mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov. However, it states that email is invalid and gives an error. If the submission is sent to the two contacts listed in the RFQ Eric Parrish and Aubrey Yerger, is the submission considered valid and properly submitted?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 07:17 AM
Yes, the submission received via email to Eric Parrish (eparrish@mt.gov) and Aubrey Yerger (ayerger@mt.gov) is considered valid.
-5-
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 07:46 AM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
Are applicants required to acknowledge the clarifications?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 15-APR-2026 03:17 PM
Clarifications are considered to be part of the Q&A. Therefore, acknowledgement of the Q&A, as indicated in Section 3.2.1 of the RFQ, is acknowledgement of the clarifications.
302 - GREYCLIFF AREA BRIDGES - September 09, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 29-APR-2026 09:24 AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on May 27, 2026.
Project Name: GREYCLIFF AREA BRIDGES
Project No: STPB 81014(2)0
Control No: 10661000
Project Description:
The scope of work for this Design-Build Contract includes services required to design and reconstruct six (6) existing bridges along Highway 10 between Greycliff and Big Timber, Montana. The Project involves replacing the aging and deteriorating bridges with new structures and will reconstruct the adjacent roadways as necessary.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ AND ATTACHMENTS
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
303 - MILL CREEK HIGHWAY - September 22, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 15-APR-2026 11:36AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on May 13, 2026.
Project Name: MILL CREEK HIGHWAY
Project No: SSS 569-1(11)6
Control No: 10473000
Project Description:
The scope of work for this Design-Build contract includes reconstruction of approximately five miles of Secondary Highway 569 (S-569), also known as Mill Creek Highway, from reference post (RP) 6.11 to RP 11.0. The project is funded by a RAISE grant awarded to Anaconda-Deer Lodge County (ADLC). The project is intended to address existing deficiencies and improve safety. The roadway will be reconstructed to include 12-foot driving lanes and 1-foot shoulders. Additionally, the project will improve roadway geometrics and reconstruct the existing pavement with new bituminous surfacing. The project will also include new centerline rumble strips, pavement markings, signage, guardrail, improved clear zones and side slopes, and improved hydraulics, culvert and storm water infrastructure.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ AND ATTACHMENTS
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.